The @properties stack in 2026: what the public record shows
@properties runs on atproperties.com — live-checked August 2026. The site positions the firm as: Our agents specialize in local real estate to help you get the best price for your home or apartment, whether you're buying or selling. Don&a… Here is the honest public record — platform, scale, ownership — and where it is simply not documented.
Checked 2026-08-24: atproperties.com is live (HTTP 200) and carries the @properties brand. Everything below is public sourcing — the firm’s own site first — and anything not documented says so.
The @properties line-by-line
| Item | What the public record shows | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Official site | atproperties.com | Live-verified 2026-08-24 (HTTP 200) |
| Model | Ownership structure is not stated in public sourcing — verify directly with the brokerage | Brand and ownership language from the firm’s own site |
| Scale | Agent and office counts are not published on the firm’s site — public sourcing through 2026-08 shows none | Counts only where the firm publishes them |
| Footprint | Public sourcing through 2026-08 does not document a headquarters city on the firm’s site | City/state signals from the firm’s site |
| Founded | A founding year is not stated in public sourcing through 2026-08 | Only from explicit founding language |
| Agent-facing platform | No agent-facing platform is named in public sourcing through 2026-08 — the site documents listings and brand, not tooling | Named only when the firm’s own markup names it — never inferred |
| Splits and fees | Not published | Ask the managing broker and get it in writing |
| Watch out — where BrokerDIY doesn’t fit | If you’re a @properties agent whose pipeline is already fed by the brand, a second platform is a cost, not a fix | BrokerDIY is a brokerage operating platform, not a bolt-on CRM |
Sources: atproperties.com (live-checked 2026-08-24) — page title, meta description, footer and body text. No third-party claims are repeated without attribution.
What to ask about the @properties stack
| Question | Why it matters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whose platform do its agents actually run on? | The public record documents brand and listings, not a named stack — pin it down in any interview | ||
| What does the brand affiliation include? | Affiliation and ownership are different things — no affiliation is documented in public sourcing; ask what referral flow and tooling that actually carries | ||
| [‘Question’, ‘Why it matters’] | [“Whose platform do this brokerage’s agents actually run on?”, ‘The public record documents brand and listings, not a named stack — pin it down in any interview’] | [‘What does the brand affiliation include?’, ‘Affiliation and ownership are different things — no affiliation is documented in public sourcing; ask what referral flow and tooling that actually carries’] | [‘How does this brokerage handle technology?’, ‘Brokerages at every scale either build, buy, or stitch — the honest question is which one this is, and what it costs agents’] |
Questions agents ask.
Does @properties give agents a CRM or tech platform?
Not one it publishes. Through August 2026 the atproperties.com site documents listings and brand, not agent tooling — the public record is positioning, not stack.
Is @properties an independent brokerage or part of something bigger?
Public sourcing through 2026-08 does not document an ownership structure — verify directly with the brokerage before relying on it.
What should an agent considering this brokerage ask about the stack?
Three things, in writing: what the platform is, what it costs the agent per month or per closing, and who owns the agent’s data when they leave.
@properties names and marks are property of their respective owners. Scale and production figures appear only where the firm publishes them; everything else is marked not documented. This guide is independent public-source research, not a @properties publication.